We at Peakfood are delighted to tell you that we have completed our first video on the intact harvester.
It explains:
- what it is
- how it works,
- why its needed and
- why it is better than the combine harvester
Full costings are included that show that the intact harvester will more than double profits for farmers.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Posted in Solutions, videos | No Comments »
Biofuels have a very important part to play in the future, as we start to derive our energy needs from present day sunshine instead of using the energy that the sun radiated millions of years ago.
However, setting targets for biofuel use with no regard for the way they are produced can be counter productive. The demand for biofuels in Europe is causing the burning and reclaiming of millions of acres of tropical forests. This releases more carbon than will be saved by growing the fuel crop and shows how badly thought out the European targets are.
In the first place, we need to obtain our biofuels from the straw of normal food crops by efficiently harvesting the whole crop intact and then separate the components to use for both food and energy. At this point the straw is a free asset because no extra energy inputs have been used. As methods for producing ethenol from cellulose become well established we will then be able to obtain more and more energy from waste as well as from biomass produces on poor land or from woodland in a sustainable way.
Posted in Solutions | No Comments »
Biofuel production, as it is done now, has a poor energy balance in that the amount of fossil fuel energy used to grow the crop, transport it and then turn it in to fuel can sometimes be almost as much as the energy in the biofuel.
The second question is if we should be turning food crops in to fuel when world reserve food stocks are running low just at the time when extreme weather events are causing food production problems in many areas.
Second generation biofuels are made from plant-derived waste such as straw, forestry waste or food waste. They can also use purposely grown crops or managed woodland. There are several companies working to produce enzymes cheap enough to make the process viable and the first commercial plants are now being built.
Today The Independent said:
“Short-term, the answer to the ‘food vs fuel’ debate is that the world needs to make tough choices: fossil fuel burning accounts for 75 to 85 per cent of global CO2 emissions; deforestation accounts for 15 to 25 per cent, so we can see where the imperative lies.
“The good news is that ’second generation’ and more innovative biofuels - on a 10-year timescale - pose less tough choices. Biofuels derived from straw, timber, manure, rice husks, agriwaste of any description, even sewage and methane from landfill waste - all could play a part with little detriment to food prices or rainforests. They also tend to be more fuel-efficient and cleaner; the US government claims a 91 per cent reduction in CO2 emissions. Add in hybrid technology in cars, higher agricultural productivity (Malthus was wrong, after all), and suddenly carbon neutrality seems almost achievable.
“If our mighty auto and oil industries bend themselves to that task, then the future can be bright, green and profitable”
The problem is that the timescale is too long if we want to keep CO2 levels down to acceptable levels at the same time as we put off oil and gas depletion. This really should have massive government spending to speed things along.
Posted in Solutions | No Comments »