<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rebecca Hoskins &#8211; A Farm for the Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peakfood.co.uk/2009/03/rebecca-hoskins-a-farm-for-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peakfood.co.uk/2009/03/rebecca-hoskins-a-farm-for-the-future/</link>
	<description>Famine in the West by 2025?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:33:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Celia</title>
		<link>http://peakfood.co.uk/2009/03/rebecca-hoskins-a-farm-for-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Celia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 06:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peakfood.co.uk/2009/03/rebecca-hoskins-a-farm-for-the-future/#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Hey, I actually agreed with the idea of lots of small woodland and hedge farms. In the programme it said one acre of normal farmland could usually feed 5 people. But in this new way of farming they can feed 10 people per acre. Therefore you would need half the space! Then of course it&#039;s much better for wildlife and the people who run it only have to work about 5 hours a week. We could still have wheat and other crops, but you could cut these between woodland areas in small squares, as they actually grow better this way. Having &#039;gardens&#039; instead of farms seems like a good idea to me - it gives attention to detail, which is extremely important. And it&#039;s probably what our ancestors did - after all, they couldn&#039;t use a tractor, could they!? And it looks as though the time may be soon when we can&#039;t either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I actually agreed with the idea of lots of small woodland and hedge farms. In the programme it said one acre of normal farmland could usually feed 5 people. But in this new way of farming they can feed 10 people per acre. Therefore you would need half the space! Then of course it&#8217;s much better for wildlife and the people who run it only have to work about 5 hours a week. We could still have wheat and other crops, but you could cut these between woodland areas in small squares, as they actually grow better this way. Having &#8216;gardens&#8217; instead of farms seems like a good idea to me &#8211; it gives attention to detail, which is extremely important. And it&#8217;s probably what our ancestors did &#8211; after all, they couldn&#8217;t use a tractor, could they!? And it looks as though the time may be soon when we can&#8217;t either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

