Search

Winner of Positive Global Change Award

Buy Printed Book £6.49 + p+p

Climate Change will Devastate Food Production

July 16th, 2007 by John

The extreme weather events that we are seeing in many parts of the world, are being made more frequent and more severe by global warming according to most experts. Although we have always had times of droughts, floods and hurricanes, the change brought on by around 1C of warming should make us extremely worried about the effect of a rise of the 3C or more that now seems certain unless radical steps are taken.
Over the last few years, extreme weather events bad enough to hit food production have happened in almost every part on the world though thankfully not at the same time. These problems have helped to bring world food stocks down to such a dangerous level that further severe droughts, floods or wet harvests would push us in to real food shortages.

Right now in the U.K. we are suffering from very wet conditions just as the cereal and oilseed harvest begins. Many pea crops have simply died as their roots cannot stand waterlogged conditions for very long. Potato fields are suffering from outbreaks of blight as it is so wet that farmers can’t get on the land to apply their normal fungicide programme. Up here in East Yorkshire, on the few occasions when harvesting has been possible, many combines have sunk down to their axles. We desperately need a period of dry weather now.

In contrast, Eastern Europe has had extremely high temperatures. Australia has had several years of drought followed by floods in some places. The U.S. has also had severe drought but luckily, the main grain growing areas have not been too badly hit.

The lesson that we should be learning from this is that we must keep warming down to levels where we have some chance of coping. Experts say that radical action to reduce emissions now could limit warming to about +2C. and maybe we could cope with that. In my opinion, more then that would cause such difficulties that famine would be the result.

Posted in Climate Change | 1 Comment »

Water Shortages are a big Threat to Food Production

July 15th, 2007 by John

Large quantities of fresh water are needed to grow crops , on average about 1,000 tons of water is used to grow 1 tonne of food, and in many parts of the world there are severe shortages as cities and industry compete with farmers. As with most things, the per capita availability of water is falling and will continue to do so. In Real Truth Magazine, M.Wayne Iceenhower reports on the growing tensions over water.

“In 1995, 31 countries—with combined populations of 458 million people—faced water stress or water scarcity, with most of the stressed areas found in the third world. The next year, 54% of all accessible freshwater from lakes, rivers, streams and underground aquifers were being consumed.

“In Africa, where 43% of the land surface is arid, drought was anticipated as a normal part of a cycle every five to six years. However, severe droughts have occurred much more frequently in recent years, affecting more than 50 million people and killing at least 2 million. This year, a spokesman for the United Nations’ Food and Agricultural Organization warned that 11 million people living in East Africa would die unless a massive relief effort commenced immediately.

“Severe drought in northern Kenya, southern Ethiopia and southwest Somalia has caused livestock to become practically worthless. “I have walked for three days to bring these animals here, and now I have to sell them at whatever price I am offered because they will not be strong enough to walk back again,” said Hussein Aden, age 25 (“Africa: Economies Worst Placed to Cope With Knock-On Effects of Drought,” UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs).

“Growing water scarcity in China could threaten economic expansion. The nation became a net food importer in 2004 due to both land and water shortages. While the present situation cannot be referred to as a crisis, increased drought (common in the north) and floods (common in the south) could quickly change the situation.

“As all nations attempt to cope with growing populations, changing weather patterns and shrinking water reserves, water will become a point of contention. The UN acknowledges that “hot spots” of conflict between nations will probably result. Here are just a few examples:

• Israel and Jordan have had past disagreements about water ownership and use, though a treaty in 1994 somewhat cooled tensions.
“• The tiny Jewish state occupies and controls the headwaters of the Jordan River, much to the dissatisfaction of Syria and Jordan. (One cause of the 1967 Arab-Israeli war was said to be water.)
“• The waters of the Blue Nile have long been a source of heated contention between Egypt and Ethiopia. Egypt’s very existence is dependent on the Nile, which supplies 98% of its water needs.
• In Turkey, the Southeast Anatolia Project is poised to divert half of the flow of the Euphrates River.

“In short, water scarcity can lead to the exchange of strong words, saber-rattling—and even armed conflict. In a world of competing nations where the powerful exploit the weak, water can and will be used as an excuse to wage war.”

Posted in Threats to Food Supply | 2 Comments »

Climate Change Effects are even worse than we thought

July 14th, 2007 by John

George Monbiot, writing in The Guardian, shows just how bad the effects of climate change could be, and voices his amazement that the public aren’t demanding that more should be done:

“Reading a scientific paper on the train this weekend, I found, to my amazement, that my hands were shaking. This has never happened to me before, but nor have I ever read anything like it. Published by a team led by James Hansen at Nasa, it suggests that the grim reports issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change could be absurdly optimistic.

“The IPCC predicts that sea levels could rise by as much as 59cm this century. Hansen’s paper argues that the slow melting of ice sheets the panel expects doesn’t fit the data. The geological record suggests that ice at the poles does not melt in a gradual and linear fashion, but flips suddenly from one state to another. When temperatures increased to between two and three degrees above today’s level 3.5 million years ago, sea levels rose not by 59cm but by 25 metres. The ice responded immediately to changes in temperature.

“We now have a pretty good idea of why ice sheets collapse. The buttresses that prevent them from sliding into the sea break up; meltwater trickles down to their base causing them suddenly to slip; and pools of water form on the surface, making the ice darker so that it absorbs more heat. These processes are already taking place in Greenland and west Antarctica.

“Rather than taking thousands of years to melt, as the IPCC predicts, Hansen and his team find it “implausible” that the expected warming before 2100 “would permit a west Antarctic ice sheet of present size to survive even for a century”. As well as drowning most of the world’s centres of population, a sudden disintegration could lead to much higher rises in global temperature, because less ice means less heat reflected back into space. The new paper suggests that the temperature could therefore be twice as sensitive to rising greenhouse gases than the IPCC assumes. ‘Civilisation developed,’ Hansen writes, ‘during a period of unusual climate stability, the Holocene, now almost 12,000 years in duration. That period is about to end.’”

Posted in Climate Change | No Comments »

« Previous Entries Next Entries »